Kill List Takes The Kitchen Sink Approach To Filmmaking
There’s no getting around the fact that reviewing Ben Wheatley’s Kill List in any kind of detail places me at an ethical impasse. It’s near impossible to avoid mentioning the film’s highlight—the way in which Wheatley experiments with genre—yet discussing these methods may ruin the film for anyone who hasn’t seen it. While I’ll do my best to remain ambiguous, it’s necessary to warn you that this review potentially contains spoilers. Then again, sometimes having a narrative twist or cameo spoiled entices one to see a film they might have otherwise overlooked. I’ll leave it to you decide which method works best here.
Another Agonizingly Dull Turn of the Screw
“Strike while the iron is hot” is one of those old adages that we’ve all run across before. It belongs to that great tradition of opportunism that suggests that if one waits too long, they’ll miss out on success. In terms of filmmaking, it’s also a belief that has been taken to its logical extreme. Used to be that remakes came out only after the original had ample time to sink into our collective consciousness, but these days it seems like remakes are ushered into theaters so hastily that the original barely has time to generate any buzz of its own. Take the latest haunted house horror film Silent House. Based on a Uruguayan film that came out not more than a year ago, its sudden and unceremonious presence in American theaters leads me to one unavoidable question: why?
Topher Grace Takes On The Lucasfilm Empire
For those of you who for some crazy reason don’t already follow SlashFilm, some big news broke today of a secret new edit of the Star Wars prequels, and it comes from the unlikeliest of sources: Topher Grace! SlashFilm head honcho Peter Sciretta was invited to a private screening of Topher’s 85-minute cut of Episodes I through III and was given permission to blog a breakdown of what transpired. The bad news is this is possibly the only peak into Grace’s cut of the films we’re likely to ever get, what with the extensive legal ramifications he would be facing should he ever go public with his version. Still, from what Sciretta lays out here, it appears that Topher’s cut is superior to the originals in nearly every way, and despite the fact that a ton of footage was left on the cutting room floor, the story hasn’t been sacrificed in any way, but is actually made more compelling.
Of course, this news leads me to another sorta Star Wars-related site that I’ve been plugging for years (and will continue to plug because the work they do there is awesome): Red Letter Media, specifically their insanely extensive video reviews of the prequels. I know that the prospect of watching three reviews 70+ minutes in length seems daunting, but the points made in each video go beyond mere sci-fi geek ranting and actually make thoughtful observations that can be applied to filmmaking in a broader theoretical sense. Until Topher Grace’s version of the prequels leaks (and let’s hope it does), this is the next best thing to detailing what could have been with regard to Lucas’ rightfully maligned trilogy. So do yourself a favor and check them out.
“Hey Asshole, Don’t Flick Your Boogers On My Crime Scene”: The Diabolical Charm of Chris LaMartina
It takes Baltimore filmmaker Chris LaMartina only five minutes or less to satisfy every expectation one presumably has for a microbudget, exploitation feature. In the opening three minutes of his 2010 slasher film, President’s Day, we’re treated to topless females, high school idiocy, a masked killer and the kind of homemade gore effects that tend to incite equal parts laughter and discomfort.
Academy Fight Song: 2011 Edition
Awards season is once again upon us, and like the grim specter of death hovering over the career of Matthew McConaughey, the Academy Awards have cast their mighty, perennial pall over the entire film industry. The nominees were announced today and there’s nary a surprise among the bunch; well, not the good kind, at least, but I’ll get to that in a moment.
I find myself most conflicted during awards season. On the one hand, I can’t help but scoff at the inept decisions the Academy makes, and this disappointment pretty much runs across the board—from the nominees, to the awards presentation itself, all the way down to the eventual winners (Slumdog Millionaire, anyone?). On the other hand, I remain irresistibly drawn to it by equal parts fascination and disgust. It’s like Japanese pornography: unwholesome, morally corrupt, humiliating for all parties involved; but at the end of the day what else are you going to masturbate to?
First and foremost, can we all agree that expanding the Best Picture nominees from five to ten remains a failed experiment on the part of the Academy? This isn’t the Republican primaries; do we really need all these mediocre candidates cluttering up the field just to bring in some extra publicity? I know people love 9/11-related stories that don’t involve Adam Sandler, but does Extremely Loud & Incredibly Close really deserve to be here? That’s not to say that any of the other candidates necessarily deserve the recognition either. The Tree of Life, as I said over the summer, is a clunky, overblown mess of a film and easily the worst project Terrence Malick has ever produced. Woody Allen, meanwhile, has directed a film that announces to the world that he stayed awake during his elementary school English class. His portrayal of Jazz Age literary figures plays less like a loving homage and more like an SNL sketch gone awry.
The Top Ten Films of 2011
It was completed under the gun and with a little help from my friends, but for the first time since 2007, I have a top ten film list for the year. I know, it’s not a particularly noteworthy cause for celebration, but I’m excited nonetheless, if for no other reason than it was a damn good year for movies. Which, come to think of it, in the preamble to lists such as this, it’s always either a good year for something or a bad year, never a just right year. I guess it doesn’t sound appropriate to say something is merely satisfactory. Thankfully, this year went above and beyond, so I need not make such concessions. From a completely silent film about passing the torch between generations to films about New Yorkers who respectively can’t stop taking photos and masturbating, the films were as varied as they were outstanding.
Normally I look upon the rankings in these lists as arbitrary and more a formality than anything else, but this time around I can say that at the very least the top three films here are of particular interest and the film at the top was far and away the best film of the year to the point where it almost demands an entirely separate list detailing the individual ways in which it excelled. Of course, that should in no way diminish the quality of the rest of the films on this list, which are all exceptional in their own right.
Special thanks to Louis Doerge and Erick Bieritz for helping out with the material. Between the three of us, we have seen a decent number of quality films this year. Though, in my case, I probably have them beat when it comes to scraping the bottom of the barrel.
Attention Theaters! Stop Showing This Ad!
I’ve been seeing a lot of movies in theaters lately and, by extension, I’ve been forced to sit through a lot of shitty commercials as well. You see, I don’t have cable or even an antenna, so I don’t have access to even the most basic television channels. Plus, I got all this ad-blocking software on my computer and I have a moratorium against watching programming on Hulu so I can’t even remember the last time I watched an actual commercial. I assume they’ve only gotten worse since I last saw one and watching unnecessary commercials before I sit down to watch the 90-minute commercial that is Ghost Protocol pretty much confirms that.
Nick’s Top Ten Albums of 2011
In terms of music, I was a little bit disappointed by 2011. New releases by some of my favorite acts (Radiohead, Drake, Atlas Sound) didn’t really manage to capture my affection. Sure, “Lotus Flower” is a great song and Bradford Cox is still one of the most interesting songwriters around, but there was very little new or groundbreaking about 2011.
As with all top 10 lists, please take mine with a grain of salt. This list is likely to change depending on the day. For instance, I’m currently fighting the urge not to put Panda Bear at number one, but there’s the voice inside my head that reminds me of how may times my #1 played during my subway rides to and from work. Some runners up: Radiohead’s The King of Limbs, Drake’s Take Care, M83’s Hurry Up We’re Dreaming, Atlas Sound’s Parallax, and Stephen Malkmus & the Jicks’ Mirror Traffic. With no further ado, my best of 2011.
Top Twenty Tracks of 2011, Part II
We’re down to the final ten and, honestly, the order of these tracks is more a formality than a hard-and-fast evaluation. I would feel comfortable calling any one of these my favorite track of the year and, in all fairness, does it really matter which is which? The bottom line is they all deserve a listen. No real need for a long-winded introduction here, I covered all that in part one. So let’s just get on with it and call it a day.
Top Twenty Tracks of 2011, Part I
Last year when I broke down my favorite tracks of the year, I stuck quite rigidly to just ten, which in hindsight was a bit foolish given the quantity of songs released in any given year. So this year I’ve decided to expand my list to include—you guessed it—twenty songs, which will probably be blown up even further next year until I finally realize that systematically ranking music is an inherently absurd proposition.
Until that time, however, I present to you twenty songs which are all slowly creeping their way into my “top 25 most played” playlist. I tried to remain as unbiased as possible with this list, not favoring tracks because they were big hits this year, but also not attempting to leave off tracks just because they were in heavy rotation on blogs and music sites. I briefly considered letting each track speak for itself and not offering any explanation as to why I loved each so, but that would run contrary to the spirit of a year-end list, no?
The Ten Most Shocking Movie Deaths
On the most basic level possible, movies can be divided into two fairly broad categories: ones in which a great many people die while the audience barely bats an eye and ones in which mortality carries with it a certain degree of weight, sort of like it does in real life. Now, to avoid being terribly reductionist, I’ll be the first to admit that this isn’t the only way to approach a film and even within this strict rubric of evaluation shades of grey exist between these two extremes with arguably the vast majority of films toeing the line between them. At the same time, I’d be surprised if an individual felt the same level of grief or introspection when Bill Paxton’s character bites it in Aliens as he or she might when, say, Bambi’s mother died. While certainly no film inspires total indifference to the concept of death (with the possible exception of Cloverfield in which every death was not only justified, but as mundanely routine as a morning constitutional), there are still certain movie deaths that stand out among the rest, conjuring up the kind of sorrow or disbelief, or whatever you want to label it as, typically reserved for more personal losses. As part of the latest entry into our ever-growing catalog of lists, I’ve decided to gather together a few such movie deaths here.
Before we begin, I should mention that by “shocking” I don’t necessarily mean “surprising” (although that term definitely comes into play). Certainly the death of Marvin in Pulp Fiction catches the audience off guard, but did anyone really lament his passing after he was gone or feel that the film was missing some integral component following his untimely demise? Ditto, Samuel L. Jackson in Deep Blue Sea. Unlike those deaths which provide a cheap thrill more than anything else, the deaths I’ve focused on here are the kind that leave an empty void in the rest of the film, as if something has been irreversibly removed from it that changes everything completely.
Oh, and I’m sure it doesn’t need to be pointed out, but there are definitely spoilers ahead.
Like Its Central Antagonist, The ‘Remake’ of Carpenter’s ‘The Thing’ Copies Its Predecessor With Monstrous Results
In case you haven’t noticed, we’ve been on a bit of a hiatus over the last few months. My apologies for the lack of content; very soon we’ll be working our way out of the cold. It will just take some time. Of course, this metaphorical freeze up here on the site makes it all the more fitting that the first film I’ve decided to review upon our return is a remake of John Carpenter’s 1982 classic gorefest The Thing which sets its cast of misfit scientists adrift in the Antarctic and pits them against a monstrous alien force capable of copying their bodies.
Located in some studio head’s office, I imagine a massive wall covered in yellow post-it notes, each one emblazoned with the name of some dormant pop culture franchise. Tiny holes are punched through the notes written with “Transformers,” “Star Trek,” “Battleship,” among dozens of others, while “Lite-Brite,” “Speed,” and “Home Alone” have escaped the flying dart’s impalement. As the “Planet of the Apes” note hangs precariously unblemished on the wall, the fat studio head prepares to throw another dart at the wall, hoping it will stick.
















